An Overview on Atopic Dermatitis, Oxidative Stress, and Psychological Stress: Possible Role of Nutraceuticals as an Additional Therapeutic Strategy.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition with a considerable impact on patients' quality of life. Its etiology is multifactorial and, among the predisposing factors, a role is played by oxidative stress. Pollution, recurrent infections, and psychological stress contribute to oxidative stress, amplifying the production of proinflammatory cytokines and worsening barrier damage. There are various oxidative stress mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of AD. Moreover, AD often appears to be associated with psychological disorders such as alexithymia, depression, and anxiety due to severe itching and related insomnia, as well as social distress and isolation. The increasing incidence of AD requires the evaluation of additional therapeutic approaches in order to reduce the psychological burden of this condition. Our review aims to evaluate the role of some nutraceuticals in AD treatment and its related psychological comorbidities. The combination of some natural compounds (flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenes, isothiocyanates) with traditional AD treatments might be useful in improving the effectiveness of therapy, by reducing chronic inflammation and preventing flare-ups, and in promoting corticosteroid sparing. In addition, some of these nutraceuticals also appear to have a role in the treatment of psychological disorders, although the underlying oxidative stress mechanisms are different from those already known for AD.

Atopic Dermatitis Disease Education.

There has been an influx of new educational resources for atopic dermatitis (AD) patients in recent years. The two primary organizations in the United States offering educational materials, online resources, and other forms of support include the National Eczema Association (NEA) and the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Educational workshops and interventions have emerged as tools that can deliver comprehensive information on AD, such as symptoms, treatments, and disease management. In regard to these workshops, studies have proven longer interventions to be more effective. Studies have also found multidisciplinary teams, including psychologists, dietitians, and AD specialists, to be more effective in AD treatment and education. Additionally, video-based education was found to be the most effective delivery medium compared to various written modes of education. Given the psychosocial impacts of AD, support groups have been found to improve life quality and decrease disease severity, with age-specific groups offering the greatest benefits. Technology such as social media and smartphones has also improved education. Social media has allowed the rapid exchange of information to wider audiences, but due to its unregulated nature, false information has also been disseminated. Despite this, web-based interventions have still been found to be satisfying, convenient, and effective in increasing treatment awareness. The advent of smartphone applications has provided patients with access to information on AD symptoms and treatment on demand. While the effectiveness of these promising applications hasn't been confirmed by studies, patient provider interactions via smartphone (teledermatology) have been found to be as effective as in-person appointments. This chapter will discuss these different types of emerging resources available to AD patients including educational materials, interventions, support groups, organizational support, and technological resources and their effectiveness.

American Academy of Dermatology Guidelines for Managing Atopic Dermatitis.

The American Academy of Dermatology first published a series of guidelines for diagnosing and managing atopic dermatitis in 2014. Twelve clinicians were selected to review, grade, and offer clinical insight on available data regarding the clinical features, symptomology, pathophysiology, education, treatment, and emerging clinical studies on atopic dermatitis (AD). Based on these findings, the AAD released a guideline to streamline information on atopic dermatitis for physicians, recommending using clinical evidence to diagnose and first treating with nonpharmacologic therapies to restore the natural skin barrier. Topical pharmacologic therapies were recommended for improving pruritus and inflammation and newer systemic agents for clinically relevant moderate-to-severe cases. Evidence-based practices were emphasized in comparison to those that lacked therapeutic data. To highlight the emerging evidence and pharmacologic breakthroughs in atopic dermatitis, the AAD produced an updated set of guidelines educating physicians on new agents and their role in treatment. This chapter reviews the AAD guidelines as a tool for managing atopic dermatitis and staying up to date on disease advancements.

The Future of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment.

This chapter thoroughly examines recent breakthroughs in atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment, with a primary focus on the medications in the development pipeline. Biologics agents targeting new interleukin receptors like interleukin-31, interleukin-22, and interleukin-2 are discussed along with the novel pathway looking at the OX40-OX40L interaction. Oral agents and small molecule therapies like Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators, and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also discussed along with the various new topical medications. Newly approved topicals like phosphodiesterase-4 and JAK inhibitors are highlighted while also discussing the potential of tapinarof and emerging microbiome-targeted therapies. Beyond conventional approaches, the chapter touches upon unconventional therapies currently being studied. The goal of this chapter is to discuss new advances in AD treatment from medications in the initial stages of development to those nearing FDA approval.

Atopic Dermatitis: Managing the Itch.

Atopic dermatitis has a substantial impact on sleep, appearance, psychological well-being, and other qualities of life. The visual appearance of lichenification, cheilitis, hyperpigmentation, ichthyosis, and erythema can be socially stigmatizing, and treatment of these symptoms is challenging. In managing pruritus in patients, practitioners should assess and document pruritus through questionnaires at each routine visit. Initially, practitioners should advise patients to employ nonpharmaceutical treatments such as emollients with wet wraps, elimination of triggers, changing scratching habits, and psychological interventions. If these methods of treatment are not successful or if the disease presentation is severe, pharmacological therapies should be employed. This chapter describes the therapeutic ladder for pruritus in atopic dermatitis and discusses each treatment modality in further detail for practitioners to advise their patients.First-line topical pharmaceutical agents include topical glucocorticoids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. Second-line topical agents include coal tar, menthol, capsaicin, or doxepin. After the use of topical agents has been exhausted, primary systemic agents can be applied. These include sedating antihistamines, nonsedating antihistamines, oral glucocorticoids, or cyclosporine A. Finally, neuromodulating or immunomodulating agents can be attempted, including SSRI/SNRIs, TCAs, immunosuppressants, neural modulators, and opioid receptor modulators. Outside of pharmacological treatments, phototherapy has been shown to provide a dramatic improvement of pruritus in atopic dermatitis and can be used at any stage of treatment including as a first-line agent.

Patient preferences for treatment attributes in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment.

Purpose: Evidence on treatment preferences of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the United States (US) is limited and an assessment of treatment preferences in this group is warranted.Materials and methods: An online discrete choice experiment survey was conducted (June 2023) among US adults with self-reported moderate-to-severe AD or experience with systemic therapy who had inadequate response to topical treatments. Preference weights estimated from conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate willingness to trade off and attributes' relative importance (RI).Results: Participants (N = 300; mean age: 45 years; 70% females; 52% systemic therapy experienced) preferred treatments with higher efficacy, lower risk of adverse events (AEs), and less frequent blood tests (p < .05). Treatment attributes, from high to low RI, were itch control (38%), risk of cancer (23%), risk of respiratory infections (18%), risk of heart problems (11%), sustained improvement in skin appearance (5%), blood test frequency (3%), and frequency and mode of administration (2%); together, AE attributes accounted for more than half of the RI.Conclusions: Participants preferred AD treatments that maximize itch control while minimizing AE risks, whereas mode of administration had little impact on preferences. Understanding patients' preferences may help improve shared decision-making, potentially leading to enhanced patient satisfaction with treatment, increased engagement, and better clinical outcomes.

Skin Barrier in Atopic Dermatitis.

A compromised permeability barrier is a hallmark of atopic dermatitis (AD). Localized to the outermost skin layer, the stratum corneum (SC) is critically dependent on terminal differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes, which transform into protein-rich corneocytes surrounded by extracellular lamellae of unique epidermal lipids, conferring permeability barrier function. These structures are disrupted in AD. A leaky barrier is prone to environmental insult, which in AD elicits type 2-dominant inflammation, in turn resulting in a vicious cycle further impairing the SC structure. Therapies directed at enforcing SC structure and anti-inflammatory strategies administered by topical and systemic route as well as UV therapy have differential effects on the permeability barrier. The expanding armamentarium of therapeutic modalities for AD treatment warrants optimization of their effects on permeability barrier function.

Atopic Dermatitis in Children.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is extremely common in the pediatric population, and most children with AD will first present to their primary care provider (PCP). The PCP can recognize AD by its clinical features, including itch, a chronic relapsing course, and the characteristic eruption. The cornerstone of AD therapy is dry skin care, typically a short daily bath/shower followed by an emollient applied to all skin. Most children with AD will also require topical medications, such as topical corticosteroids and/or topical nonsteroidal therapies. For children with more severe disease, systemic agents, including several novel therapies, may be required. In managing AD, the clinician must monitor for side effects of medications as well as complications of the AD itself, the most common of which is secondary infection. An understanding of the pathogenesis, treatments, and complications of AD is essential for the PCP, as untreated (or undertreated) AD has a significant impact on the quality of life of affected children and their caregivers. [Pediatr Ann. 2024;53(4):e121-e128.].

Population-based cohort study to investigate the changes in prevalence, severity profile, and treatment modalities used in Korean atopic dermatitis patients.

In this retrospective study spanning from 2002 to 2019, we analyzed data from 355,277 Korean patients diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (AD) through the National Health Insurance System. Our objective was to comprehensively analyze the trends in prevalence, severity profiles, and treatment approaches for AD in Korea over this 18-year period. Initially, AD prevalence stood at 3.88% in 2002 but notably rose to 5.03% by 2019. During the same period, while AD prevalence decreased in the 0-1-year-old group (from 34.52% to 24.83%), it remained relatively stable in the 1-11-year-old group. Conversely, the 12-19-year-old and 20 years or older age groups witnessed substantial increases in AD prevalence, climbing from 2.55 to 6.02% and 1.44% to 3.53%, respectively. Moreover, the proportion of patients classified as having moderate to severe AD grew from 30.96 to 39.78%. Surprisingly, the prescription pattern, predominantly based on corticosteroid administration, exhibited minimal change despite the rising prevalence of moderate and severe AD cases. These findings underline a persistent reliance on corticosteroid-based treatments for AD, even as the condition's severity escalates among Korean adolescents and adults. Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop novel treatment guidelines emphasizing biologics that offer enhanced safety and efficacy.

Patients' and Caregivers' Experiences Navigating the Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in Argentina.

Background and Objectives: Little is known about patients' and caregivers' experiences with atopic dermatitis (AD) in Argentina, so a survey was administered to learn more. Materials and Methods: A 53-item anonymous survey was administered in Spanish to adult AD patients (n = 334) and caregivers (n = 339) of pediatric AD patients in Argentina (total n = 673). Demographics, healthcare provider information, financial burden, disease severity, disease burden, level of disease-specific education, and experience with shared physician/patient decision making were collected. Linear and logistic regression models were used for statistical comparisons. Results: Survey respondents were overwhelmingly female (90.8%), as was the overall patient population (72.8%). Patients were seen mostly by healthcare specialists (66.8% dermatologists, 13.5% pediatricians, 7.7% allergists, and 7.2% general practitioners). Only 2.8% of respondents reported no symptoms, while 33.3%, 52.4%, and 11.5% reported mild, moderate, and severe AD disease, respectively. Anxiety/depression and pain/discomfort were the most impactful on respondents' quality of life. Caregivers of children with moderate to severe AD and adult patients with severe AD reported a significant financial burden, including using savings or not purchasing food or other essentials to afford medical care. Few people reported receiving disease-specific education or having their own treatment priorities taken into consideration. For adult patients, receiving disease education and being asked about treatment priorities were associated with higher treatment satisfaction and AD control. Discussion: Mental health, pain/discomfort, and financial worries are the most important burdens for adult AD patients and caregivers of children with AD in Argentina. We recommend prioritizing disease-specific education and shared decision making to improve AD care in Argentina.

Does Molluscum Contagiosum Need to be Managed Differently in Atopic Children?

The association between molluscum contagiosum and concomitant atopic dermatitis and its impact on clinical features and treatment outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective study, conducted in the paediatric dermatology clinic of a tertiary medical centre, aimed to compare molluscum patients with and without atopic dermatitis. A total of 615 children with molluscum were included, 13.17% of whom had atopic dermatitis. While the latter group exhibited higher lesion count and itchiness (p=0.026 and p=0.044, respectively), no significant differences were observed in average lesion diameter, ulceration, purulence, and erythema (p=0.239, p=0.730, p=0.682, and p=0.296, respectively). Both groups showed comparable responses to molluscum-specific and supportive treatments, with no distinct difference in outcomes or recurrence of visits. It was concluded that atopic dermatitis does not exacerbate molluscum morbidity, inflammation markers, treatment outcomes or recurrence rates.

Effectiveness of atopic dermatitis patient education programs - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patient education in atopic dermatitis (AD) has worked in parallel to the gold standard of pharmacological treatment as a foundational component of therapeutic regimens. In addition to improving patient education, past investigations of educational interventions have demonstrated profound reductions in disease severity for patients living with AD. However, prior meta-analytical work has focused mostly on comparing in-person interventions, and thus the need to determine the effectiveness of virtual methodologies in the current post-COVID era remains. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the effectiveness of online programming in AD education compared to in-person interventions. A comprehensive search was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2019. Studies were retrieved based on articles published up to 04 April 2023. Adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement guided the reportage process for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary outcome of our meta-analysis was the effect of various educational modalities on atopic dermatitis severity as measured by multiple scales across the studies, the most common including SCORAD, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). Most studies were randomized controlled trials, primarily from North America and Western Europe and focused on patient and/or caregiver education about disease management, self-care techniques, avoidance of triggers, and comprehensive understanding of the disease process. Our pooled analyses showed that targeted educational programs in understudied adult populations can be as impactful as those in pediatric groups. Moreover, virtual interventions can be employed as constructive tools for reducing barriers of access to patient education. Future research on educational interventions should utilize various methodologies to encourage individual learning preferences with a focus on adult cohorts.

[RECOMMENDATION FOR ITCH ASSESSMENT FROM THE ATOPIC ITCH CONSENSUS MEETING (AICOM)].

BACKGROUND: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research. METHODS: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants. RESULTS: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers. CONCLUSION: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.

[Children with atopic eczema and their environment]. / L'enfant atteint d'eczéma atopique et son environnement.

Taking an interest in the environment of a child suffering from eczema means understanding the word "environment" in the broadest possible sense: the child's lifestyle, family, social and cultural environment. By taking all these aspects into account, we can optimize the effectiveness of treatments, and avoid the multiple problems and comorbidities associated with moderate and severe eczema. It's up to caregivers to be vigilant about this, and to reposition the right gestures by spotting errors right from the start, even in the case of mild eczema. The best way to respond to this challenge, i.e. to help parents understand, is to draw on the principles of therapeutic patient education.

Unraveling the skin; a comprehensive review of atopic dermatitis, current understanding, and approaches.

Atopic dermatitis, also known as atopic eczema, is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by red pruritic skin lesions, xerosis, ichthyosis, and skin pain. Among the social impacts of atopic dermatitis are difficulties and detachment in relationships and social stigmatization. Additionally, atopic dermatitis is known to cause sleep disturbance, anxiety, hyperactivity, and depression. Although the pathological process behind atopic dermatitis is not fully known, it appears to be a combination of epidermal barrier dysfunction and immune dysregulation. Skin is the largest organ of the human body which acts as a mechanical barrier to toxins and UV light and a natural barrier against water loss. Both functions face significant challenges due to atopic dermatitis. The list of factors that can potentially trigger or contribute to atopic dermatitis is extensive, ranging from genetic factors, family history, dietary choices, immune triggers, and environmental factors. Consequently, prevention, early clinical diagnosis, and effective treatment may be the only resolutions to combat this burdensome disease. Ensuring safe and targeted drug delivery to the skin layers, without reaching the systemic circulation is a promising option raised by nano-delivery systems in dermatology. In this review, we explored the current understanding and approaches of atopic dermatitis and outlined a range of the most recent therapeutics and dosage forms brought by nanotechnology. This review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases.

Severe atopic dermatitis in early infancy: characteristics, challenges and new perspectives in clinical practice.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common skin disease in infants and children with a prevalence of 10% in the first two years of life. In this age group up to 15% are severely affected. "Children are not little adults" - this applies in particular to infants with severe atopic dermatitis. Age-specific clinical aspects (psychosocial, neurocognitive, morphological) of the disease require an adjusted disease management. Considering recent approval of systemic treatment options, early identification of infants and children with severe and early persistent disease is of particular importance also in view of possible prevention of atopic comorbidity. As several inborn errors of immunity (IEI) share features of the atopic phenotype, it is essential for clinicians to distinguish signs of immunodeficiency from severe AD. Here, we describe a practical approach on the basis of clinical history and key dermatological and laboratory findings. Furthermore, this paper is aimed at providing an update on general management of severe AD in early infancy, including recommendations for systemic treatment.

INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: Atopic Dermatitis Skincare and Impact on Quality of Life for Patients with Skin of Color.

Atopic Dermatitis (AD) epidemiologic studies report a higher incidence and prevalence among populations with skin of color (SOC). Additionally, differences in AD underlying gene mutations and skin morphology are observed to lead to frequent and prominent xerosis, pruritus, and pigmentary sequelae in patients of color. However, populations with SOC are underrepresented in dermatology clinical trials, including AD. This article reviews the nuances in AD epidemiology, clinical presentation, and impact on quality-of-life among populations with SOC, plus highlight the role of skincare in AD management. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:3(Suppl 2):s6-11.